• Calendar

    October 2006
    S M T W T F S
    « Sep   Nov »
    1234567
    891011121314
    15161718192021
    22232425262728
    293031  
  • Categories

  • Good Reads

    Widget_logo
  • Frame-by-Frame Movie Reviews


Archive for October, 2006

THE AMERICAN CHURCHILL

Posted by Trisha on October 31st, 2006

By Frank J. Gaffney, Jr. as found here.

It is not every day that a politician chooses to use the closing days of a hotly contested, and exceedingly high-stakes, election to give voters bad news. Yet, in Pennsylvania, the incumbent Senator, Rick Santorum, is courageously doing just that.

Specifically, Sen. Santorum is stumping across his state telling constituents about the most important issue with which the man they elect next week will have to contend: a world in which America’s people and vital interests are in grievous danger. With pages literally ripped from Winston Churchill’s memoir about the run-up to World War II, the Senator is providing an unvarnished assessment of the “Gathering Storm” that threatens our generation – and those of our children and grandchildren – unless addressed in creative and effective ways.

I had a chance to witness first-hand the clarion call Rick Santorum is giving to the people of his state and the rest of this country as I introduced him to audiences in Pittsburgh, Johnstown and Erie last week. He spoke with passion and authority about the combination of enemies who are currently joining forces – despite differences of ideology no less dramatic than those of Nazi Germany, Soviet Russia, Imperial Japan and Fascist Italy when they were allies during World War II – to advance a common goal of destroying America and other freedom-loving nations.

Notably, Sen. Santorum addressed squarely the danger posed by “Islamic fascists,” a term he does not shrink from using. He understands that it does not defame peaceable, tolerant Muslims. Rather, it distinguishes the latter from those who make up the virulent and violent totalitarian political movement that seeks to conquer and repress the Muslim and non-Muslim worlds, alike.

The Senator is no Johnny-come-lately to this subject. For years, he has been discussing how this ideology of hatred is translating – thanks to state-sponsors such as Iran, Syria, North Korea, Pakistan and Venezuela – into a mortal peril, not just to Israel and our forces and friends in the Mideast, but to Europe, Latin America and even our own homeland. With an indefatigability and clarity reminiscent of Britain’s wartime prime minister, he stresses that the conflict we are in is, as a result, about more than Iraq and not a “war on terror.” It is, instead, a war for the Free World. Voters in Pennsylvania and elsewhere need to understand that next week as they entrust their lives for years to come to one representative or another.

Like Churchill before him, Sen. Santorum is far more than a Cassandra warning of the dangers ahead. He is a man with a record of leadership and accomplishment who both recognizes such perils and works effectively to devise and adopt appropriate strategies for dealing with them.

For example, Rick Santorum has sought to apply the lessons of Ronald Reagan’s destruction of the Soviet Union to our current, global struggle with today’s totalitarians. In the Senate, he has led on energy self-reliance, military readiness, homeland security and political warfare. The Senator has also been a prime-mover behind legislation aimed at de-legitimating the odious Iranian and Syrian regimes and empowering domestic opposition aimed at bringing them down. Such an outcome represents the only realistic hope for preventing freedom’s defeat in Iraq and its imperiling elsewhere.

The commanding grasp shown by Sen. Santorum of the most important issues of our day stands in stark contrast to the haplessness of his opponent, State Treasurer Bob Casey, Jr., when it comes to the war. He has generally declined to debate the substance of the incumbent’s positions and judgments, offering – often incoherently – canned talking points and platitudes seemingly focus-group tested to obscure his lack of knowledge or gravitas.

In the past few days, Sen. Santorum has found a way of starkly demonstrating to Pennsylvania’s voters that Treasurer Casey is more than unprepared for the job he seeks in the U.S. Senate. He has also been missing-in-action when it comes to the role he could have been playing to support the war effort in his present job .

Rick Santorum has been joined on the campaign trail by Mr. Casey’s counterpart from Missouri, Sarah Steelman. Ms. Steelman has shown what a state treasurer can accomplish if they understand the nature of the threat we face – and are interested in doing something about it.

Under Treasurer Steelman’s leadership, the Missouri Investment Trust (MIT) has become the first public pension fund in the nation to divest from its portfolio the stocks of companies doing business with state-sponsors of terror like Iran, Syria, North Korea and Sudan. She has thereby ensured that the fund’s beneficiaries are not unwittingly having their retirement savings invested in ways that are strategically counterproductive, morally reprehensible and even ill-advised from a financial point of view. (A study done for Ms. Steelman proved that the MIT would have performed better last year had it been terror-free than it was investing in companies partnering with our enemies.) She has also helped empower American investors to privatize the war for the Free World.

Bob Casey has not exhibited this kind of leadership in Pennsylvania. To the contrary, he has been indifferent to the fiduciary and strategic implications of a business- as-usual approach to what amounts to his state pension funds’ investments in terror-sponsoring states.

Pennsylvanians should return a man we all need in the Senate – the American Churchill, Rick Santorum, not entrust the job to a man who, in his present position, has neither understood nor helped to win the war for the Free World.

Sphere: Related Content

“Studio 60″ to get the axe

Posted by Trisha on October 29th, 2006

I read a short article on MSN a day or two ago about what needs to be done to fix my new favorite tv show, Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip (I went back to try to find it with no luck. I do believe it was on their front page yesterday, though). Tonight, hubby im’s me this article about the show.

I am quite bummed that it is being cancelled. As a person who rarely (read: never) watches SNL, I actually enjoyed this show. Maybe it was because I loved the West Wing and bradley Whiteford now stars in Studio 60. Maybe it’s because I love Matthew Perry. I’m not really sure why I like it so much. I just do. Now I have nothing to look forward to on Monday nights :( Well…that’s not entirely true. The Colts will be on MNF in a few weeks.

Until then, I’ll be watching Law & Order SVU and Criminal Intent re-runs.

Sphere: Related Content

U.S. Investigates Voting Machines’ Venezuela Ties

Posted by Trisha on October 29th, 2006

From today’s New York Times:

The federal government is investigating the takeover last year of a leading American manufacturer of electronic voting systems by a small software company that has been linked to the leftist Venezuelan government of President Hugo Chávez.

The inquiry is focusing on the Venezuelan owners of the software company, the Smartmatic Corporation, and is trying to determine whether the government in Caracas has any control or influence over the firm’s operations, government officials and others familiar with the investigation said.

The inquiry on the eve of the midterm elections is being conducted by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, or Cfius, the same panel of 12 government agencies that reviewed the abortive attempt by a company in Dubai to take over operations at six American ports earlier this year.

The committee’s formal inquiry into Smartmatic and its subsidiary, Sequoia Voting Systems of Oakland, Calif., was first reported Saturday in The Miami Herald.

Officials of both Smartmatic and the Venezuelan government strongly denied yesterday that President Chávez’s administration, which has been bitterly at odds with Washington, has any role in Smartmatic.

“The government of Venezuela doesn’t have anything to do with the company aside from contracting it for our electoral process,” the Venezuelan ambassador in Washington, Bernardo Alvarez, said last night.

Smartmatic was a little-known firm with no experience in voting technology before it was chosen by the Venezuelan authorities to replace the country’s elections machinery ahead of a contentious referendum that confirmed Mr. Chávez as president in August 2004.

Seven months before that voting contract was awarded, a Venezuelan government financing agency invested more than $200,000 into a smaller technology company, owned by some of the same people as Smartmatic, that joined with Smartmatic as a minor partner in the bid.

In return, the government agency was given a 28 percent stake in the smaller company and a seat on its board, which was occupied by a senior government official who had previously advised Mr. Chávez on elections technology. But Venezuelan officials later insisted that the money was merely a small-business loan and that it was repaid before the referendum.

With a windfall of some $120 million from its first three contracts with Venezuela, Smartmatic then bought the much larger and more established Sequoia Voting Systems, which now has voting equipment installed in 17 states and the District of Columbia.

Since its takeover by Smartmatic in March 2005, Sequoia has worked aggressively to market its voting machines in Latin America and other developing countries. “The goal is to create the world’s leader in electronic voting solutions,” said Mitch Stoller, a company spokesman.

But the role of the young Venezuelan engineers who founded Smartmatic has become less visible in public documents as the company has been restructured into an elaborate web of offshore companies and foreign trusts.

“The government should know who owns our voting machines; that is a national security concern,” said Representative Carolyn B. Maloney, Democrat of New York, who asked the Bush administration in May to review the Sequoia takeover.

“There seems to have been an obvious effort to obscure the ownership of the company,” Ms. Maloney said of Smartmatic in a telephone interview yesterday. “The Cfius process, if it is moving forward, can determine that.”

The concern over Smartmatic’s purchase of Sequoia comes amid rising unease about the security of touch-screen voting machines and other electronic elections systems.

Government officials familiar with the Smartmatic inquiry said they doubted that even if the Chávez government was some kind of secret partner in the company, it would try to influence elections in the United States. But some of them speculated that the purchase of Sequoia could help Smartmatic sell its products in Latin America and other developing countries, where safeguards against fraud are weaker.

A spokeswoman for the Treasury Department, which oversees the foreign investment committee, said she could not comment on whether the panel was conducting a formal investigation.

“Cfius has been in contact with the company,” said the spokeswoman, Brookly McLaughlin, citing discussions that were first disclosed in July. “It is important that the process is conducted in a professional and nonpolitical manner.”

The committee has wide authority to review foreign investments in the United States that might have national security implications. In practice, though, it has focused mainly on foreign acquisitions of defense companies and other investments in traditional security realms.

Since the political furor over the Dubai ports deal, members of Congress from both parties have sought to widen the purview of such reviews to incorporate other emerging national security concerns.

In late July, the House and the Senate overwhelmingly approved legislation to expand the committee’s scope, give a greater role to the office of the director of national intelligence and strengthen Congressional oversight of the review process.

But the Bush administration opposed major changes, and Congressional leaders did not act to reconcile the two bills before Congress adjourned.

Foreigners seeking to buy American companies in areas like defense manufacturing typically seek the committee’s review themselves before going ahead with a purchase. Legal experts said it would be highly unusual for the panel to investigate a transaction like the Sequoia takeover, and even more unusual for the panel to try to nullify the transaction so long after it was completed.

It is unclear, moreover, what the government would need to uncover about the Sequoia sale to take such an action.

The investment committee’s review typically involves an initial 30-day examination of any transactions that might pose a threat to national security, including a collective assessment from the intelligence community. Should concerns remain, one of the agencies involved can request an additional and more rigorous 45-day investigation.

In the case of the ports deal, the transaction was approved by the investment committee. But the Dubai company later abandoned the deal, agreeing to sell out to an American company after a barrage of criticism by legislators from both parties who said the administration had not adequately reviewed the deal or informed Congress about its implications.

The concerns about possible ties between the owners of Smartmatic and the Chávez government have been well known to United States foreign-policy officials since before the 2004 recall election in which Mr. Chávez, a strong ally of President Fidel Castro of Cuba, won by an official margin of nearly 20 percent.

Opposition leaders asserted that the balloting had been rigged. But a statistical analysis of the distribution of the vote by American experts in electronic voting security showed that the result did not fit the pattern of irregularities that the opposition had claimed.

At the same time, the official audit of the vote by the Venezuelan election authorities was badly flawed, one of the American experts said. “They did it all wrong,” one of the authors of the study, Avi Rubin, a professor of computer science at Johns Hopkins University, said in an interview.

Opposition members of Venezuela’s electoral council had also protested that they were excluded from the bidding process in which Smartmatic and a smaller company, the Bizta Corporation, were selected to replace a $120 million system that had been built by Election Systems and Software of Omaha.

Smartmatic was then a fledgling technology start-up. Its registered address was the Boca Raton, Fla., home of the father of one of the two young Venezuelan engineers who were its principal officers, Antonio Mugica and Alfredo Anzola, and it had a one-room office with a single secretary.

The company claimed to have only two going ventures, small contracts for secure communications software that a Smartmatic spokesman said had a total value of about $2 million.

At that point, Bizta amounted to even less. Company documents, first reported in 2004 by The Herald, showed the firm to be virtually dormant until it received the $200,000 investment from a fund controlled by the Venezuelan Finance Ministry, which took a 28 percent stake in return.

Weeks before Bizta and Smartmatic won the referendum contract, the government also placed a senior official of the Science Ministry, Omar Montilla, on Bizta’s board, alongside Mr. Mugica and Mr. Anzola. Mr. Montilla, The Herald reported, had acted as an adviser to Mr. Chávez on elections technology.

More recent corporate documents show that before and after Smartmatic’s purchase of Sequoia from a British-owned firm, the company was reorganized in an array of holding companies based in Delaware (Smartmatic International), the Netherlands (Smartmatic International Holding, B.V.), and Curaçao (Smartmatic International Group, N.V.). The firm’s ownership was further shielded in two Curaçao trusts.

Mr. Stoller, the Smartmatic spokesman, said that the reorganization was done simply to help expand the company’s international operations, and that it had not tried to hide its ownership, which he said was more than 75 percent in the hands of Mr. Mugica and his family.

“No foreign government or entity, including Venezuela, has ever held any stake in Smartmatic,” Mr. Stoller said. “Smartmatic has always been a privately held company, and despite that, we’ve been fully transparent about the ownership of the corporation.”

Mr. Stoller emphasized that Bizta was a separate company and said the shares the Venezuelan government received in it were “the guarantee for a loan.”

Mr. Stoller also described concerns about the security of Sequoia’s electronic systems as unfounded, given their certification by federal and state election agencies.

But after a municipal primary election in Chicago in March, Sequoia voting machines were blamed for a series of delays and irregularities. Smartmatic’s new president, Jack A. Blaine, acknowledged in a public hearing that Smartmatic workers had been flown up from Venezuela to help with the vote.

Some problems with the election were later blamed on a software component, which transmits the voting results to a central computer, that was developed in Venezuela.

Sphere: Related Content

Pa-the-tic

Posted by Trisha on October 28th, 2006

Hey Painter…YOU STINK!

 

Hey Coach Tiller….LEAVER PAINTER ALONE! Did you ever once think that screwing with his warm-up routine would hurt you? Well, DUH!

Brain teaser for you

Posted by Trisha on October 27th, 2006

Can you figure this out? Count the men carefully…

 

Fast Eddy at it again

Posted by Trisha on October 27th, 2006

And why am I not surprised? If I were a senior, I’d be pissed at him, too!

Rendell strongly defended the decision to legalize up to 61,000 slot machines at 14 sites, saying the benefits to the state in the form of new economic development money, jobs and tax relief will far outweigh the negatives.

He added that residents are already gambling — just not in Pennsylvania. They’re driving or being bused across state lines to New Jersey and West Virginia, spending $4 billion a year at out-of-state casinos…

…Asked whether easier access to casinos will result in an increase in the number of people addicted to gambling, Rendell said yes, but added that “for every one person who falls addicted to gambling or loses their paycheck, I’ll show you 500 — mostly seniors — who spent $40 at a casino and had the best day of their month.

“And if you don’t believe me, come to Philadelphia — I know exactly where the buses board for Atlantic City.

“These are people who lead very gray lives. They don’t see their sons and daughters very much. They don’t have much social interaction. There’s not a whole lot of good things that happen in their month,” the governor said of some seniors.

“But if you put them on the bus they’re excited. They’re happy. They have fun. They see bright lights. They hear music. They pull that slot machine and with each pull they think they have a chance to win,” he said.

“Most of them lose, and they lose $40 — less than they would lose in Philadelphia if they went to a movie and dinner. And that should be their option.

“I’m not saying gambling is a good thing,” Rendell said. “I’m just saying it exists, and it’s going to exist whether we have it or not. And if you think gambling is all evil, you ought to come on one of those bus trips.

“It’s unbelievable what brightness and cheer it brings to older Pennsylvanians,” he said. “Unbelievable.”

 

source 

It’s not evil, yet he admits that it will lead to an increase in an addiction. A bit contradictory, don’t you think?

Sphere: Related Content

Is this not the oddest tree?

Posted by Trisha on October 26th, 2006

I have never seen a tree like this one.

Have you?

Very weird.

Inverted evergreen. And it’s ever so fabulous. Originating as a 12th-century tradition in central Europe, this new version is becoming a fast favorite. Featuring a lush 3,700-tip count with artificial specialty foliage for a lifelike look. And it’s unique design allows for ample room to display all your favorite ornaments. With 800 clear bulbs for a brilliant sparkle in any room. Another plus? It’s flame-resistant and crush-resistant for long-lasting, beautiful use. Plus, it has lots of other convenient features, including: single-strand, easy-to-hide wires, metal hinges to avoid pinching wires, a multioutlet cord for improved access to plugs, spare bulbs and a sturdy stand. Even better than that, is its easy-to-assemble design with branches that are hinged to a tree frame for total convenience. The finale — there’s plenty of room underneath for all sorts of presents!

Features:  
- 800 lights
- 3,700 tips
- Preassembled, hinged branches
- Multioutlet cord
- Replacement bulbs
- Tree stand
  • 7-foot height
  • Flame-resistant

Interested? prepare to shell out a whopping $650.00!

Too steep for you? You’re in luck….it’s on sale! Yep! You can snag it for a measly $487.50 at Kohls.com

Sphere: Related Content

Tim Horton’s = Bad Coffee

Posted by Trisha on October 24th, 2006

I have never been to Tim horton’s before today, but after dropping Alex off at preschool, I decided I wanted a cup of coffee before heading off to his field trip (the EMTA trolley bus! How fun! The best part was going through the bus wash….for him, it was getting a blue flahing light that they gave the kids to wear on Halloween night). Tim Horton’s was the closest place, so I thought I would try it out and dropped in for a cup of coffee.

It was terrible. So bad I didn’t even finish it. And for me not to finish a cup of coffee is unheard of. Honestly, I make a better cup at home using Giant Eagle brand coffee! No amount of cream and sugar made it any better, unfortunately. I am disappointed, since I heard they had great coffee. And I’m really disappointed because they are cheaper than Starbucks, and, in the off chance I actually treat myself to coffee outside of my own kitchen, I thought they’d be a viable alternative. Guess not :(

Sphere: Related Content

Today’s workout

Posted by Trisha on October 24th, 2006

I haven’t worked out in several days, so it felt good to workout again!

  • 18 minutes cardio
  • 4 minutes strength
  • 8 min stretching

What are you going to be?

Posted by Trisha on October 22nd, 2006

I am borrowing this topic from one of my MySpace friends.

What are you or your kids going as for Halloween? I haven’t dressed up and gone t-or-t’ing since my mom and step-dad got married on Halloween in ‘98.

But, the kids are going as their favorite NASCAR drvers. Ryan is Jeff Gordon, Zach is Dale Jr, and I’m making Alex a Kasey Kahne costume, since they don’t make one of those. I’ll be sure to post pics after their Halloween party on Sunday :)

Sphere: Related Content

Bad Behavior has blocked 837 access attempts in the last 7 days.